We will soon meet again in Toulouse in order to take up the challenge to which Lacan invit us in 1967: to find what our joy is in the never entirely comfortable exercise of work in the institution. (6)
The renew interpretation
Eric Laurent made us feel to what extent this modifies the conception of interpretation which is no longer ruc to finding the censor chapter of the history of the subject, the univocal “it was written”. In Lacan’s last teaching, interpretation then consists of opening up to other possible readings of what was written.
But then, how can we orient ourselves towards this enjoyment that is in control? How can we intervene on the words that have struck the body? On this trauma of language? In what way can treatment through speech be possible? How does psychoanalysis operate in a situation of “radicalization of enjoyment” 6 , when the subject no longer goes through the Other object of his suffering, “but through an autoerotic knowlge” 7 ?
Enjoyment is outside the norm
The Other must welcome the new, the foreign, the unheimlich . It is an ethical and also political lesson that they give us. Our four contributors to this work – Marie-Hélène Brousse, Philippe Lacadée, Laure Naveau and Daniel Roy – also phone number list provide their valuable insight into this resolutely contemporary clinic. What are we looking for in these objects of technology that claim to respond to the lack, when the lack is structural? The lack, Laure Naveau tells us, is the great secret of psychoanalysis. procrastination and laziness are relatives with the same result Lacan places this lack in language itself, in a capital A that he writes as a cross-out capital A. (the Other without Other)
Our era generates addiction since the consumer society promotes an ever-increasing consumption of objects of enjoyment. Addiction is a way of refusing dissatisfaction and it is a way of denying lack. in the mode of an addiction, a pathology,.
But on the other hand, “the network
can be an attempt at a solution to generaliz autism. It can reinvent a social link for an adolescent who can come and talk to an analyst about it. There is a ne to take back the word, to find “this lost dignity of the subject of speech.”
Every desiring experience is link to an object. The adolescent of hyper-modernity has a singular relationship to the object betting email list and to the lack, a relationship that fills the lack with the object of technology. It is an attempt to compensate for the non-existence of the sexual relationship, a denial of castration, a new form of perversion. There is then for the analyst to create desire in the form of the desire to know.